<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dodgy Wiring</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.arenamagazine.co.uk/filmandmusic/dodgy-wiring/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.arenamagazine.co.uk/filmandmusic/dodgy-wiring/</link>
	<description>the world's smartest men's magazine</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 04:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin Knight</title>
		<link>http://www.arenamagazine.co.uk/filmandmusic/dodgy-wiring/#comment-43364</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Knight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 10:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arenamagazine.co.uk/?p=1445#comment-43364</guid>
		<description>Last time The Wire was written about on here I said I'd only seen series one (because, for me, to watch a series involves shelling for the DVDs and then prioritising watching them above things I want to watch that are actually on telly and so can't wait) and that remains the case; I've just seen the one series, having been turned onto it by David Simon's Homicide book.
.
I think it's really great but its canonisation by the media recently &lt;i&gt;has&lt;/i&gt; started to irk me, because most of it seems to imply that 'the best written TV series' and 'the best TV series' are analogous; sorry, but they're not.
.
No one disgraces themselves in the other departments, but they are bettered by others working on other shows I believe. I can remember watching the pilot and thinking: this came from the same stable as The Sopranos!? Fortunately, the quality shot up almost immediately when the series was greenlit; but you still wouldn't figure the two shows for cousins if you had only seen clips of them; lots of people are saying how novelistic it is... cool, but that doesn't automatically &lt;i&gt;trump&lt;/i&gt; cinematic. And the jury over the best TV series could reasonably still be out. Let's just concede that The Wire is the best at what &lt;i&gt;it&lt;/i&gt; does, and wait a bit more before anointing it more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last time The Wire was written about on here I said I&#8217;d only seen series one (because, for me, to watch a series involves shelling for the DVDs and then prioritising watching them above things I want to watch that are actually on telly and so can&#8217;t wait) and that remains the case; I&#8217;ve just seen the one series, having been turned onto it by David Simon&#8217;s Homicide book.<br />
.<br />
I think it&#8217;s really great but its canonisation by the media recently <i>has</i> started to irk me, because most of it seems to imply that &#8216;the best written TV series&#8217; and &#8216;the best TV series&#8217; are analogous; sorry, but they&#8217;re not.<br />
.<br />
No one disgraces themselves in the other departments, but they are bettered by others working on other shows I believe. I can remember watching the pilot and thinking: this came from the same stable as The Sopranos!? Fortunately, the quality shot up almost immediately when the series was greenlit; but you still wouldn&#8217;t figure the two shows for cousins if you had only seen clips of them; lots of people are saying how novelistic it is&#8230; cool, but that doesn&#8217;t automatically <i>trump</i> cinematic. And the jury over the best TV series could reasonably still be out. Let&#8217;s just concede that The Wire is the best at what <i>it</i> does, and wait a bit more before anointing it more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynical Scribble</title>
		<link>http://www.arenamagazine.co.uk/filmandmusic/dodgy-wiring/#comment-43338</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynical Scribble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 08:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arenamagazine.co.uk/?p=1445#comment-43338</guid>
		<description>Nobody ever mentions the fact that it can be impossible to understand what some characters are saying.  I think I only managed to decifer about 10% of words that Snoop said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody ever mentions the fact that it can be impossible to understand what some characters are saying.  I think I only managed to decifer about 10% of words that Snoop said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
